久久精品国产国产精-中文字幕久久波多野结衣av-精品久久久久久中文字幕无码vr-亚洲国产一区二区三区波多野结衣-最新国产精品久久精品

Technical document

Surface Treatment Processes for Metal Insert Injection Molds

2025-11-13 10:48:45 Injection Molds
The surface treatment of metal insert injection molds is critical to product bonding quality, mold service life, and mass production stability. It directly impacts the bonding strength between metal inserts and plastics, the wear/corrosion resistance of mold cavities, and molding consistency. In practice, scientific surface treatment significantly improves insert-plastic bonding strength and extends mold life by 2-3 times. For test spline molds, precise surface treatment is essential to ensure test data reliability and accurate mass production process transfer. This article focuses on practical needs, explaining core processes, test spline mold requirements, and technical trends for industrial reference.

I. Basics of Surface Treatment Processes

  1. Core Objectives: Enhance mold cavity wear/corrosion resistance against molten plastic erosion; optimize surface microstructure to improve mechanical bonding between plastics and inserts, preventing peeling/cracking; ensure surface precision and consistency for repeatable test data and stable mass production. Test spline molds must simulate mass production conditions, as their treatment directly affects material compatibility and bonding strength evaluation.

  2. Technical Standards: Industry-recognized criteria include surface roughness Ra (0.8-2.5μm, adjustable by plastic type), adhesion grade ≥5B (cross-cut test), wear resistance for over 10,000 injection cycles (no obvious scratches), and corrosion resistance (neutral salt spray test ≥48 hours, no rust). Test spline mold surface treatment consistency error must stay within a reasonable range for valid batch comparison.

  3. injection mould

II. Core Surface Treatment Processes and Applications

(I) Mechanical Treatment Processes

  1. Sandblasting: Uses white corundum abrasive grains to form a uniform uneven surface via controlled spray pressure, increasing Ra to 1.2-2.0μm for better mechanical bonding. Test spline mold cavities require secondary sandblasting to ensure uniform texture and stable test data.

  2. Knurling and Grooving: Optimizes knurling modulus and groove dimensions for insert contact areas, enhancing plastic-insert mechanical interlocking. Suitable for high-stress components in automotive/electronics industries.

  3. Polishing: Uses diamond paste for mirror finishing (Ra ≤0.8μm), ideal for transparent plastics or medical products with high surface requirements, preventing flow marks and burrs.

(II) Chemical Treatment Processes

  1. Phosphating: A common anti-rust process. Immersing molds in zinc phosphate solution forms a uniform phosphating film (adhesion grade 5B) with neutral salt spray resistance ≥72 hours, suitable for humid environments or corrosive plastics.

  2. Silane Coupling Agent Treatment: Key for verifying material compatibility in test spline molds. A 1%-3% mass fraction silane solution (via dipping/spraying) forms chemical bridges between metals and plastics, boosting bonding strength.

  3. Electroless Nickel Plating: Deposits a layer with HV600-800 hardness, offering excellent wear resistance. Suitable for glass fiber-reinforced plastic molds to extend service life.

(III) Physical Treatment Processes

  1. Plasma Treatment: Activates surfaces with argon/oxygen plasma, reducing contact angle and improving plastic-metal wetting without chemical residue. Suitable for medical-grade molds.

  2. Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD): Deposits TiN/CrN hard coatings via magnetron sputtering (HV2000-3000), with 5-8 times higher wear resistance than traditional treatments. Ideal for high-speed mass production; applied to test spline molds to reduce surface wear impact on data.

  3. injection mould

III. Core Requirements for Test Spline Mold Surface Treatment

  1. Core Principles: Prioritize surface consistency > bonding adaptability > wear resistance > corrosion resistance, centered on "simulating mass production and ensuring test validity." Cavity treatment parameters must match mass production molds to avoid process misjudgment.

  2. Process Selection: Match material combinations (glass fiber-reinforced plastics + brass inserts: sandblasting + silane treatment; special engineering plastics + stainless steel inserts: plasma + PVD). Adjust roughness (1.5-2.0μm for bonding strength tests, 0.8-1.2μm for dimensional stability). Unify parameters for the same test mold set to ensure data repeatability.

  3. Parameter Control: Cavity Ra controlled within ±0.1μm (multi-point roughness tester inspection); coating adhesion ≥5B (no peeling in cross-cut tests); surface roughness change remains reasonable after 1,000+ injections, with no obvious wear/corrosion.

IV. Process Optimization and Test Spline Verification

  1. Parameter Optimization: Adjust parameters by material characteristics. For stainless steel + polyolefin, match silane concentration and treatment temperature; for aluminum alloy + ABS, reduce sandblasting pressure to avoid insert damage.

  2. Verification Indicators: Shear bonding strength complies with GB/T 1040.3-2006; no mold sticking on splines; no bonding cracking after multiple thermal aging cycles.

  3. Mass Production Transfer: Maintain consistent equipment, parameters, and testing standards. Conduct first-article bonding strength tests; proceed with mass production only if deviation from test spline data is within a reasonable range.

V. Common Problems and Solutions

  1. Large Test Data Fluctuations: Caused by uneven treatment or excessive roughness deviation. Optimize parameters (constant-speed sandblasting, more inspection points, same-batch treatment fluids).

  2. Mold Sticking and Spline Deformation: Due to insufficient roughness or poor compatibility. Increase Ra to 1.2-1.5μm, add plasma treatment, or use controlled mold release agent.

  3. Severe Long-Term Wear: Resulting from insufficient wear resistance. Add PVD coating after basic treatment to improve hardness and extend service life to 5,000+ cycles.

  4. injection mould

VI. Technical Trends

Surface treatment is evolving toward precision, environmental friendliness, and intelligence. Digitally, CAE simulation predicts treatment impact on bonding strength, reducing test spline runs. Environmentally, chromium-free phosphating and water-based silane agents replace traditional chemical treatments to cut emissions. Intelligently, online detection (laser roughness meters) monitors surfaces in real time, with algorithms adjusting parameters for batch consistency. Composite processes (e.g., sandblasting + plasma + PVD) are widely used to balance bonding strength, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance for high-end manufacturing.

VII. Conclusion

Surface treatment is critical to metal insert injection mold performance, and test spline mold treatment directly determines process feasibility and test validity. In practice, select processes based on material combinations, test needs, and mass production conditions. Strictly control key parameters (roughness, adhesion) and verify via test splines before mass production transfer. Future integration of digital, environmental, and intelligent technologies will make surface treatment more precise, efficient, and green, supporting metal insert injection technology in high-end manufacturing.

injection mould


Home
Product
News
Contact
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲2019av无码网站在线| 欧美丰满少妇xxxxx| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 色妞www精品免费视频| 在线精品亚洲一区二区绿巨人| 亚洲性人人天天夜夜摸18禁止| 无码亲近乱子伦免费视频在线观看| 国产精品成人永久在线四虎| 无码草草草在线观看| 大香大香伊人在钱线久久| 久久亚洲美女精品国产精品| 精久国产av一区二区三区孕妇| 国外亚洲成av人片在线观看| 色欲天天婬色婬香综合网| 亚洲成av人片在线观看高清| 顶级少妇做爰视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类丝袜一区| 国产三级韩国三级日产三级| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区av| 亚洲欧美在线观看| 狠狠狠色丁香综合婷婷久久| 色天天躁夜夜躁天干天干| 国产亚洲欧美日韩一区图片| 丰满少妇被猛烈进入无码| 在线看无码的免费网站| 国产激情з∠视频一区二区| 国产精品人妻久久毛片高清无卡| 韩国精品一区二区无码视频| 国产精品亚洲精品一区二区| 亚洲国产精品日韩av专区 | 一区二区视频日韩免费| 香蕉精品亚洲二区在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区在线播放| 国产免费丝袜调教视频| 大香线蕉伊人精品超碰| 亚洲成av人片在线观看无码 | 国模冰莲自慰肥美胞极品人体图| 国产精品内射久久久久欢欢| 性无码一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲六月丁香六月婷婷| 精品无人区卡一卡二卡三乱码|